Use for multi-perspective analysis with both Codex and Gemini exploring different viewpoints. Triggers on "council perspectives", "pros and cons from council", "council evaluate options", "what are the tradeoffs", "council consensus".
Multi-perspective analysis with both Codex and Gemini, each exploring for/against/neutral viewpoints for comprehensive evaluation.
high (default for balanced analysis)
Identify the topic/question for consensus
Gather relevant context
For each model, request stance-based analysis:
Analyze this topic from multiple perspectives:
Topic: <topic or decision>
Please provide:
1. **FOR** arguments - Best case for this approach
2. **AGAINST** arguments - Concerns and risks
3. **NEUTRAL** assessment - Objective analysis
4. **Recommendation** - Your balanced conclusion
Run BOTH commands in parallel:
Codex:
codex exec --sandbox read-only -c model_reasoning_effort="high" "<prompt>"
Gemini:
gemini -s -y -o json "<prompt>"
Synthesize multi-model, multi-perspective analysis
## AI Council Consensus Analysis
### Codex (GPT-5.2) Perspectives:
**FOR:**
- [Pro arguments]
**AGAINST:**
- [Con arguments]
**NEUTRAL:**
- [Objective observations]
**Recommendation:** [Codex's conclusion]
---
### Gemini Perspectives:
**FOR:**
- [Pro arguments]
**AGAINST:**
- [Con arguments]
**NEUTRAL:**
- [Objective observations]
**Recommendation:** [Gemini's conclusion]
---
### Council Consensus:
**Unanimous FOR:** [Points both models agree are advantages]
**Unanimous AGAINST:** [Concerns both models share]
**Divergent Views:** [Where the models disagree]
**Cross-Model Insights:**
- [Unique insights from combining perspectives]
**Council Recommendation:**
[Synthesized recommendation based on all perspectives from both models]
**Confidence Level:** [High if both agree, Medium if partial agreement, Low if divergent]
---
*Session IDs: Codex=[id], Gemini=[id]*