Write sales playbooks with qualification frameworks, discovery question banks, objection handling scripts, competitive positioning, and deal stage definitions that align the sales team on methodology.
Gather the following from the user. If anything is missing, ask before proceeding:
If the user says "we just need objection handling," clarify: objection handling without qualification criteria means reps spend time overcoming objections on deals that should never have entered the pipeline.
Firmographic Fit:
- Company size: [Employee range and/or revenue range]
- Industry: [Target verticals]
- Tech stack: [Required tools or platforms in use]
Behavioral Signals:
- [Currently using competitor X or manual process Y]
- [Recently hired for role Z / posted job for...]
- [Visited pricing page, requested demo]
Disqualification Criteria:
- [Below minimum deal size]
- [No budget authority within 90 days]
- [Locked into multi-year competitor contract]
| Stage | Entry Criteria | Rep Actions | Exit Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prospecting | Matches ICP | Research, personalize outreach | Meeting booked with decision maker |
| Discovery | Meeting confirmed | Run discovery, identify pain | Pain, timeline, budget known |
| Qualification | Pain confirmed | Complete MEDDIC | Champion identified, process mapped |
| Solution Design | Qualified opportunity | Demo, technical validation | Technical win confirmed |
| Proposal | Technical win | Present pricing, negotiate | Verbal agreement |
| Closed Won | Signed contract | Handoff to CS | Revenue recognized |
| Closed Lost | Deal lost at any stage | Document loss reason | Loss reason in CRM |
Deals cannot skip stages. If a rep cannot articulate the exit criteria for the current stage, the deal is not at that stage.
| Element (MEDDIC) | Question to Answer | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics | What business outcomes does the buyer measure? | "Reduce onboarding by 50%" |
| Economic Buyer | Who signs the check? | Title and name confirmed |
| Decision Criteria | What will they evaluate on? | Security, UX, price |
| Decision Process | What steps to purchase? | Eval, security, legal |
| Identify Pain | What is the cost of not solving this? | "$200K/yr in manual work" |
| Champion | Who is selling internally on our behalf? | Can articulate why you win |
A deal without a champion is a deal without an internal advocate.
Reps should use 8-12 questions per call, not all of them.
Pain: "Walk me through what happens today when [problem scenario]." / "How much time does your team spend on this per month?" / "What happens if you do not solve this in the next 6 months?"
Decision Process: "Who else needs to be involved?" / "What does your purchasing process look like for tools at this price point?" / "Is there an event driving this decision?"
Budget: "Is there budget allocated, or would this need approval?" / "Where does this rank against other priorities this quarter?"
Competition: "Are you evaluating other solutions?" / "Have you considered building this internally?"
Use Acknowledge, Reframe, Respond for each objection:
"Your price is too high." Acknowledge pricing matters. Reframe to cost of the problem: "You mentioned [X hours/week] on [process] at [$Y/hour] — that is [$Z/year]." Cite a customer who saw ROI in [N months].
"We can build this ourselves." Acknowledge the team's capability. Reframe to opportunity cost: "Building typically takes [X months] at [$Y fully loaded], plus ongoing maintenance." Cite a customer who switched from internal build.
"We are happy with [Competitor]." Acknowledge the competitor. Reframe to the specific gap: "Teams that switch typically cite [differentiator]." Offer a reference customer who made the same switch.
"Not a priority right now." Acknowledge timing. Ask what would change priority. Quantify cost of waiting. Set a specific reconnect date tied to their trigger event.
| Dimension | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | [Segment/use case] | [Segment/use case] | [Segment/use case] |
| Pricing | [Model and range] | [Model and range] | [Model and range] |
| Key strength | [Differentiator] | [Their strength] | [Their strength] |
| Key weakness | [Honest limitation] | [Their gap] | [Their gap] |
| Landmine Q | — | [Question exposing gap] | [Question exposing gap] |
Landmine questions surface a competitor's weakness without trash-talking.