Assessing Quality of Mental Health Support in LLM Responses

This skill enables Claude to evaluate LLM-generated responses in mental health and therapeutic contexts using the 6-attribute dual-dimension rubric from Badawi et al. (2026). It operationalizes a clinically grounded scoring framework that separately measures Cognitive Support (structured guidance, factual accuracy, safety) and Affective Resonance (empathy, helpfulness, interpretive alignment), exposing the cognitive-affective gap that plagues most LLM therapeutic output. Use this to build evaluation pipelines, audit chatbot responses, score test datasets, or implement quality gates for mental-health-oriented conversational AI.

When to Use

• When the user asks to evaluate or score an LLM's response to a mental health query
• When building a quality assurance pipeline for a therapy chatbot or emotional support system
• When comparing multiple LLM outputs on therapeutic dialogue and need a structured rubric
• When auditing an existing mental health application for clinical safety and empathetic tone
• When the user wants to identify the cognitive-affective gap in their model's outputs
• When implementing automated or human-in-the-loop evaluation for mental health AI
• When designing prompt engineering improvements to boost affective resonance in LLM responses