Tooluniverse Antibody Engineering

When uncertain about any scientific fact, SEARCH databases first (PubMed, UniProt, ChEMBL, ClinVar, etc.) rather than reasoning from memory. A database-verified answer is always more reliable than a guess.

When to Use

Apply when user asks:

• "Humanize this mouse antibody sequence"
• "Optimize antibody affinity for [target]"
• "Assess developability of this antibody"
• "Predict immunogenicity risk for [sequence]"
• "Engineer bispecific antibody against [targets]"
• "Reduce aggregation in antibody formulation"
• "Design pH-dependent binding antibody"
• "Analyze CDR sequences and suggest mutations"

Critical Workflow Requirements

1. Report-First Approach (MANDATORY)

1. Create the report file FIRST: antibody_optimization_report.md
2. Progressively update as analysis completes
3. Output separate files:
   • optimized_sequences.fasta - All optimized variants
   • humanization_comparison.csv - Before/after comparison
   • developability_assessment.csv - Detailed scores

See REPORT_TEMPLATE.md for the full report template with section formats.

2. Documentation Standards (MANDATORY)

Every optimization MUST include per-variant documentation with:

• Original and optimized sequences
• Humanization score (% human framework)
• CDR preservation confirmation
• Metrics table (humanness, aggregation risk, predicted KD, immunogenicity)
• Data source citations

Phase 0: Tool Verification

Required Tools

CRITICAL: SOAP tools (IMGT, SAbDab, TheraSAbDab) require an operation parameter. See QUICK_START.md for correct usage.

Workflow Overview

Phase 1: Input Analysis & Characterization
├── Sequence annotation (CDRs, framework)
├── Species identification
├── Target antigen identification
├── Clinical precedent search
└── OUTPUT: Input characterization
    ↓
Phase 2: Humanization Strategy
├── Germline gene alignment (IMGT)
├── Framework selection
├── CDR grafting design
├── Backmutation identification
└── OUTPUT: Humanization plan
    ↓
Phase 3: Structure Modeling & Analysis
├── AlphaFold prediction
├── CDR conformation analysis
├── Epitope mapping
├── Interface analysis
└── OUTPUT: Structural assessment
    ↓
Phase 4: Affinity Optimization
├── In silico mutation screening
├── CDR optimization strategies
├── Interface improvement
└── OUTPUT: Affinity variants
    ↓
Phase 5: Developability Assessment
├── Aggregation propensity
├── PTM site identification
├── Stability prediction
├── Expression prediction
└── OUTPUT: Developability score
    ↓
Phase 6: Immunogenicity Prediction
├── MHC-II epitope prediction (IEDB)
├── T-cell epitope risk
├── Aggregation-related immunogenicity
└── OUTPUT: Immunogenicity risk score
    ↓
Phase 7: Manufacturing Feasibility
├── Expression level prediction
├── Purification considerations
├── Formulation stability
└── OUTPUT: Manufacturing assessment
    ↓
Phase 8: Final Report & Recommendations
├── Ranked variant list
├── Experimental validation plan
├── Next steps
└── OUTPUT: Comprehensive report

Phase 1: Input Analysis & Characterization

Goal: Annotate sequences, identify species/germline, find clinical precedents.

Key steps:

1. Annotate CDRs using IMGT numbering (CDR-H1: 27-38, CDR-H2: 56-65, CDR-H3: 105-117)
2. Identify closest human germline genes via IMGT_search_genes
3. Search clinical precedents via TheraSAbDab_search_by_target
4. Get target antigen info via UniProt_get_entry_by_accession

Output: Sequence information table, CDR annotation, target info, clinical precedent list.

See WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md Phase 1 for code examples.

Phase 2: Humanization Strategy

Goal: Select human framework, design CDR grafting, identify backmutations.

Key steps:

1. Search IMGT for IGHV/IGKV human germline genes
2. Score candidate frameworks by identity, CDR compatibility, and clinical use
3. Design CDR grafting onto selected framework
4. Identify Vernier zone residues that may need backmutation (positions 2, 27-30, 47-48, 67, 69, 71, 78, 93-94)
5. Generate at least 2 variants: full humanization and with key backmutations
6. Calculate humanization score (framework humanness, CDR preservation, T-cell epitopes, aggregation risk)

Output: Framework selection rationale, grafting design, backmutation analysis, humanized sequences.

See WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md Phase 2 for code examples.

Phase 3: Structure Modeling & Analysis

Goal: Predict structure, analyze CDR conformations, map epitope.

Key steps:

1. Predict Fv structure via alphafold_get_prediction (VH:VL)
2. Assess pLDDT scores by region (framework, CDRs, interface)
3. Classify CDR canonical structures and calculate RMSD
4. Search known epitopes via iedb_search_epitopes
5. Compare with clinical antibody structures via SAbDab_search_structures

Output: Structure quality table, CDR conformation analysis, epitope mapping, structural comparison.

See WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md Phase 3 for code examples.

Phase 4: Affinity Optimization

Goal: Design affinity-improving mutations via computational screening.

Key steps:

1. Identify interface residues (distance cutoff 4.5 A)
2. Screen all amino acid substitutions at CDR interface positions
3. Rank by predicted binding energy change (ddG < -0.5 kcal/mol = favorable)
4. Design combination strategy: single -> double -> triple mutants
5. Consider CDR-H3 extension, tyrosine enrichment, salt bridge formation
6. Optional: pH-dependent binding via histidine substitutions

Output: Ranked mutation list, combination strategy, expected affinity improvements.

See WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md Phase 4 for code examples.

Phase 5: Developability Assessment

Goal: Comprehensive developability scoring (0-100) across five dimensions.

Key steps:

1. Aggregation: Find aggregation-prone regions, calculate TANGO/AGGRESCAN scores, assess pI
2. PTM liability: Scan for deamidation (NG/NS), isomerization (DG/DS), oxidation (Met/Trp), N-glycosylation (N-X-S/T)
3. Stability: Predict thermal stability (Tm target >70C, Tonset >65C)
4. Expression: Predict CHO titer and soluble fraction
5. Solubility: Predict maximum formulation concentration

Scoring: Weighted average (aggregation 0.30, PTM 0.25, stability 0.20, expression 0.15, solubility 0.10). Tiers: T1 (>75), T2 (60-75), T3 (<60).

Output: Component scores, overall score, tier classification, mitigation recommendations.

See WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md Phase 5 and CHECKLISTS.md for scoring details.

Phase 6: Immunogenicity Prediction

Goal: Predict immunogenicity risk and design deimmunization strategy.

Key steps:

1. Scan 9-mer peptides against IEDB for MHC-II binding epitopes
2. Count non-human residues in framework regions
3. Assess aggregation-related immunogenicity
4. Calculate total risk score (0-100, lower is better): Low <30, Medium 30-60, High >60
5. Propose deimmunization mutations (remove T-cell epitopes while preserving CDRs)
6. Compare with clinical precedent ADA rates

Output: T-cell epitope list, risk score breakdown, deimmunization strategy, clinical comparison.

See WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md Phase 6 for code examples.

Phase 7: Manufacturing Feasibility

Goal: Assess expression, purification, formulation, and CMC feasibility.

Key steps:

1. Assess codon optimization for CHO, identify rare codons
2. Design signal peptide
3. Plan 3-step purification: Protein A capture -> cation exchange polishing -> viral nanofiltration
4. Recommend formulation (buffer, pH, stabilizer, tonicity)
5. Define analytical characterization panel (SEC-MALS, CEX, CE-SDS, SPR, DSF)
6. Estimate CMC timeline and costs (typically 18-24 months, $1.65-2.65M to IND)

Output: Expression assessment, purification strategy, formulation recommendation, CMC timeline.

See MANUFACTURING.md for detailed manufacturing content and WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md Phase 7 for code.

Phase 8: Final Report & Recommendations

Goal: Compile all findings into a ranked recommendation with validation plan.

Key outputs:

1. Top candidate with key metrics (humanness, affinity, developability, immunogenicity, stability, expression)
2. Key improvements table comparing original vs. optimized
3. Experimental validation plan: In vitro (3-4 months) -> Lead optimization (2-3 months) -> Preclinical (6-12 months)
4. Backup variants with profiles and recommendations
5. IP considerations: FTO analysis, CDR novelty, patentability
6. Next steps: Immediate (month 1-3), short-term (4-6), long-term (7-24)

See REPORT_TEMPLATE.md for the full report template.

Tool Reference

IMGT Tools

• IMGT_search_genes: Search germline genes (IGHV, IGKV, etc.)
• IMGT_get_sequence: Get germline sequences
• IMGT_get_gene_info: Database information

Antibody Databases

• SAbDab_search_structures: Search antibody structures
• SAbDab_get_structure: Get structure details
• TheraSAbDab_search_therapeutics: Search by name
• TheraSAbDab_search_by_target: Search by target antigen

Immunogenicity

• iedb_search_epitopes: Search epitopes
• iedb_search_bcell: B-cell epitopes
• iedb_search_mhc: MHC-II epitopes
• iedb_get_epitope_references: Citations

Structure & Target

• alphafold_get_prediction: Structure prediction
• UniProt_get_entry_by_accession: Target info
• RCSBData_get_entry: Experimental structures

Systems Biology (for Bispecifics)

• STRING_get_interaction_partners: Protein interactions
• STRING_get_enrichment: Pathway analysis

Reference Files