Use this skill when nuclear review pages are thin, inaccurate, mismatched to the wrong Word document, or still read like placeholders. It covers mapping HTML review pages to the correct source `.docx`, regenerating summary pages from source documents, and fixing page-specific review templates that need richer summaries.
This skill handles review-page content quality. Use it when a review page is too limited, reflects the wrong topic, or needs to be rebuilt from the corresponding full Word review.
Audit the current mapping before editing content. Use:
python3 scripts/review_template_audit.pypython3 scripts/regenerate_review_summaries.py --dry-runPrefer source-driven regeneration over hand-editing long summaries. The main inputs are:
Reviews_useredit/*.docxdocs/file-mapping.jsonscripts/regenerate_review_summaries.pyIf a page maps to the wrong document, update the mapping or manual override first. Regenerate the page only after the source match is defensible.
If a page is intentionally shorter than the full review, make that explicit. Summary pages should read as concise overviews and should link readers toward fuller coverage where available.
Re-run the dry-run audit until placeholder carryover, wrong-source corrections, and low-confidence matches are gone.
scripts/regenerate_review_summaries.py is the primary mechanism for replacing those thin pages with document-derived summaries..docx; do not invent unsupported details to make a page look longer.