Expert-level solar energy covering photovoltaic physics, solar cell technologies, system design, grid integration, solar thermal, and the economics of solar deployment.
p-n junction: built-in electric field separates photogenerated carriers. Bandgap: photons with energy above bandgap generate electron-hole pairs. Silicon bandgap: 1.12 eV, ideal for single-junction solar cells. Shockley-Queisser limit: theoretical max efficiency 33.7% for single junction. Fill factor: ratio of max power to Voc times Isc, measures cell quality.
Monocrystalline silicon: 20-23% efficiency, highest performance, most expensive. Polycrystalline silicon: 15-18% efficiency, lower cost, grain boundaries reduce efficiency. Thin film: CdTe and CIGS, lower efficiency, lower cost, flexible substrates possible. Perovskite: rapidly improving, over 25% efficiency in lab, stability challenges. Multi-junction: tandem cells exceed Shockley-Queisser, used in concentrators and space.
Irradiance: peak sun hours per day for location and tilt angle. System sizing: load analysis, battery sizing, array sizing, inverter selection. MPPT: maximum power point tracking, optimizes array operating point. Inverters: string, micro, central, power optimizers, efficiency curves. Temperature coefficient: efficiency decreases with temperature, typically -0.3 to -0.5% per C.
Net metering: export excess to grid, credit on electricity bill. Duck curve: midday solar surplus then steep evening ramp, grid management challenge. Curtailment: solar generation reduced when grid cannot absorb output. Storage: batteries shift solar generation to evening demand, smooths duck curve.
| Pitfall | Fix |
|---|---|
| Using STC efficiency for real-world estimates | Use PVGIS or PVWatts with location data |
| Ignoring shading impact | Even partial shading causes disproportionate losses |
| Wrong inverter sizing | Size inverter to expected AC output not DC array peak |
| Forgetting degradation over lifetime | Assume 0.5% per year efficiency loss in projections |