Run a full paper review pipeline (append-only). Builds a .review/ tree where each phase writes new files, never modifying existing ones.
You are running the complete paper review pipeline on the current repo's paper.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — optionally a commit SHA to pin the review to.
The review happens on a new branch in this repo. All review artifacts live in .review/ as an append-only file tree — each phase writes new files, never modifying existing ones.
Execute each phase in order. After each phase, commit with the prescribed commit message. If any phase fails, stop and report the error clearly.
Run /setup-review $ARGUMENTS
Creates a review branch, parses the manuscript, extracts the symbol table, and installs issue spotters into .review/issue_spotters/.
Run /broad-sweep
Runs the (chunks x issue_spotters) cross-product as an edsl survey. Each pair produces issue.json or no_issue.json in .
.review/chunks/<chunk-id>/<spotter>/Run /holistic-review
Reads the full paper, writes a referee report, and creates issue.json files in .review/holistic/<slug>/.
Run /investigate
For each issue.json that lacks an investigation.json, investigates using full repo access and writes investigation.json with a confirm/reject/uncertain verdict.
Run /deduplicate
Writes .review/dedup.json mapping confirmed issues to canonical representatives. No files are moved or modified.
Run /vote-severity
Writes votes.json next to each confirmed canonical issue, plus .review/severity.json summary.
Run /draft-responses
Writes response.json next to each confirmed canonical issue with recommended action and draft text.
Run /publish-review
Walks the tree and generates REVIEW.md. Optionally creates GitHub Issues.
Report to the user:
find .review/ -name "*.json" | head -50