Scout Migrate From Ftr

• If the suite mostly validates data correctness, migrate it to a Scout API test (or unit/integration) instead of a Scout UI test.
• Prefer component/unit tests (RTL/Jest) for isolated UI behaviors rather than Scout functional tests. Strong candidates for RTL/Jest:
  • Internal component logic: loading/error states, conditional rendering based on props or hooks.
  • Table/list structure: column configuration, row rendering, sorting.
  • Hover states, tooltips, popovers, and field validation — use RTL or Storybook.
  • Filter behavior that doesn't require a running server.
• Follow steps 1–10 below. Common migration failures: missing UI tags, wrong Scout package imports, relying on ordering/shared state, and ingestion/setup that isn't space/parallel-safe.

Guardrails / gotchas (high signal)

• Preserve relevant comments: if FTR test comments provide useful context (intent, workarounds, non-obvious setup), keep them in the migrated Scout spec. Drop only outdated comments.
• Scout specs are standalone: don't rely on file execution order or loadTestFile() indexes.
• Each Scout test() runs in a fresh browser context: if an FTR suite used multiple it() blocks as one journey, combine into one test() + test.step(). Do login/navigation in beforeEach (avoid page/browserAuth/pageObjects in beforeAll).
• Keep one suite per file, avoid nested describe, and don't use *.describe.configure().
• Keep spec files focused and small: aim for 4–5 short test scenarios or 2–3 long scenarios per file. This is critical for parallel execution, where the test runner balances work at the spec-file level — oversized specs create bottlenecks.
• UI tests: tags are required (validated at runtime).
• parallel_tests/: ingest via parallel_tests/global.setup.ts + globalSetupHook (don't use esArchiver in spec files).
• Use the correct Scout package for the test location (@kbn/scout vs @kbn/scout-security/@kbn/scout-oblt/@kbn/scout-search) and import expect from /ui or /api.
• TypeScript layout for Scout tests (pick one; see Where Scout tests are typechecked under step 6): either fold test/scout/**/* into the plugin root tsconfig.json and add Scout kbn_references (like discover_enhanced), or keep dedicated test/scout/{ui,api}/tsconfig.json files. Only the latter forbids relative imports into server/ / public/.
• Replace FTR config nesting / per-suite server args with uiSettings / scoutSpace.uiSettings and (when needed) apiServices.core.settings(...).
• Auth/roles are fixture-driven: browserAuth (UI), requestAuth (API key), samlAuth (cookie / cookieHeader), plus custom roles. Avoid FTR-style role mutation. For Scout API tests, see Scout API auth (cookieHeader vs API key) under step 4.

Core workflow

1) Decide the test type

• Component/unit test (RTL/Jest): if the behavior can be tested in isolation, prefer RTL/Jest and skip Scout entirely. Strong candidates:
  • Internal component logic: loading/error states, conditional rendering based on props or hooks.
  • Table/list structure: column configuration, row rendering, data-driven assertions.
  • Form fields and filters: input validation, field interactions, filter clearing.
  • Hover states, tooltips, popovers, and toggle behaviors.
  • Feature-flagged UI: tabs/sections that appear based on config, agent type, or license.
• Scout API test: if the suite validates server responses, data correctness, or backend behaviors, migrate to a Scout API test.
• Scout UI test: if the suite validates user flows and rendering that require a real browser, migrate to a Scout UI test.
• Data validation belongs in API tests (or unit tests), not UI tests.

2) Place files correctly

• UI: <module-root>/test/scout*/ui/{tests,parallel_tests}/**/*.spec.ts
• API: <module-root>/test/scout*/api/{tests,parallel_tests}/**/*.spec.ts
• UI: use ui/parallel_tests/ + spaceTest when the flow can be space-isolated (state is scoped to a Kibana space) and should run in parallel; otherwise use ui/tests/ + test. See Scout parallelism for details on when to choose parallel vs sequential.
• API: default to api/tests/ (sequential). Use api/parallel_tests/ + parallel.playwright.config.ts only when the test is safe to run in parallel (no shared state) and you need the speedup.
• Parallel UI: avoid hardcoded saved object IDs (they can differ per space) and make names unique when needed (often suffix with scoutSpace.id).

Tags when the FTR suite was "deployment agnostic"

For available tag helpers and their meaning, see Deployment tags.

FTR deployment-agnostic configs often load the same files under both stateful and serverless. In Scout, do not assume tags.deploymentAgnostic is the right default for every migrated spec. Instead:

• Solution modules (x-pack/solutions/observability|security|search/...): use explicit solution targets (e.g. [...tags.stateful.classic, ...tags.serverless.observability.complete]) so CI only runs where that solution is present. Match sibling specs in the same module.
• Platform modules (src/platform/**, x-pack/platform/**): tags.deploymentAgnostic is appropriate when the original intent was "run everywhere."

API and UI specs should both carry tags that match the intended run-tests / CI targets; see step 9.

3) Translate the test structure

• describe/it -> test.describe/test or apiTest.describe/apiTest (but don't assume 1:1 it -> test).
• before/after -> test.beforeAll/test.afterAll.
• beforeEach/afterEach -> test.beforeEach/test.afterEach.
• Keep one suite per file and a flat hierarchy (avoid nested describe; use test.step() inside a test for structure).
• If a single FTR file contains multiple top-level describe blocks, split into multiple Scout specs (one describe per file).
• Nested describe blocks: if the FTR file has nested describes, prefer splitting into separate Scout spec files. However, if the file is small and the nested describes are lightweight, flatten them into a single test.describe with individual test(...) blocks using test.step(...) for sub-structure instead of creating many tiny spec files.

Combine duplicate stateful / serverless FTR tests

FTR often has separate but near-identical test files under test/*api_integration*/ (stateful) and test/serverless/ (or similar directories). Before migrating each file individually, compare them: if the test flow is identical or almost identical, combine into a single Scout spec with tags covering both deployment targets (e.g. [...tags.stateful.classic, ...tags.serverless.observability.complete]). Extract any deployment-specific differences into conditional helpers or small branching within the spec. Only keep separate specs when the flows genuinely diverge.

it blocks are sometimes steps (not full test cases)

In FTR it's common for multiple it(...) blocks in one describe(...) to behave like a single user journey (shared browser state across its). In Scout (Playwright), each test(...) runs with a fresh browser context, so you usually can't preserve that state across multiple tests.

Guideline:

• If the FTR suite uses multiple it(...) blocks as sequential steps of one flow, combine them into a single test(...) and convert the step boundaries into test.step(...).
• If an it(...) block is already an independent test case, keep it as its own test(...) and ensure it sets up its own preconditions.

Minimal sketch:

// FTR: multiple `it`s continue in the same browser context
it('create entity', async () => {});
it('edit entity', async () => {}); // continues...

// Scout: combine into one test and use `test.step` for debuggability
test('create and edit entity', async () => {
  await test.step('create entity', async () => {});
  await test.step('edit entity', async () => {});
});

4) Replace FTR dependencies

• Replace supertest calls with Scout apiClient (endpoint under test) + requestAuth/samlAuth (auth). FTR stateful tests often use supertest with an implicit admin role—don't carry that over blindly. Research whether a lower default role like editor or viewer is sufficient; comparing the roles used in the serverless version of the same test (if one exists) is a good starting point.
• Replace other FTR services with Scout fixtures (pageObjects, browserAuth, apiServices, kbnClient, esArchiver).
• Use apiServices/kbnClient for setup/teardown and verifying side effects.
• Audit FTR before/after hooks carefully—don't copy them verbatim. Review every call in before/beforeEach/after/afterEach and verify it is still correct for Scout: replace FTR-specific APIs with their Scout equivalents, remove unnecessary calls (e.g. FTR service initialization that Scout fixtures handle automatically), and add any missing setup or cleanup that the FTR suite neglected. Ensure every resource created in beforeAll/beforeEach has matching cleanup in afterAll/afterEach—FTR suites frequently lack proper teardown. Place kbnClient.savedObjects.cleanStandardList() (or scoutSpace.savedObjects.cleanStandardList()) in afterAll, not beforeAll; beforeAll cleanup masks missing teardown and hides leaked state from previous runs.
• Replace webdriver waits with Playwright/page object methods.
• Move UI selectors/actions into Scout page objects; register new page objects in the plugin fixtures index.
• If the test needs API setup/cleanup, add a scoped API service and use it in beforeAll/afterAll.
• Replace per-suite FTR config flags with uiSettings / scoutSpace.uiSettings, and (when needed) apiServices.core.settings(...).
• Use the correct Scout package for the test location (@kbn/scout vs @kbn/scout-<solution>), and import expect from /ui or /api.
• If the test needs rison-encoded query params, use @kbn/rison and add it to test/scout*/ui/tsconfig.json kbn_references.

Scout API auth (cookieHeader vs API key)

For general Scout API auth patterns (requestAuth, samlAuth, common headers, code examples), see Authentication in Scout API tests.

FTR mapping: FTR roleScopedSupertest with useCookieHeader: true / withInternalHeaders maps to samlAuth + cookieHeader merged with common headers on apiClient requests. FTR supertest with API key auth maps to requestAuth.getApiKey(...) + apiKeyHeader.

FTR migration gotchas (not covered in the general doc):

• Handlers that call core.security.authc.apiKeys.create (nested API keys) often fail with HTTP 500 when the incoming request uses an API key. Use samlAuth.asInteractiveUser('admin') (or the role FTR used with cookies) for those routes.
• Negative / least-privilege tests that in FTR used a custom role + cookie (e.g. empty kibana: [] privileges) and expect 404 from scoped saved-object access: use samlAuth.asInteractiveUser(customRoleDescriptor) + cookieHeader. requestAuth.getApiKeyForCustomRole(...) can resolve 200 for the same role shape because API-key privilege resolution differs from an interactive session.

5) Split loadTestFile suites

• Each loadTestFile target becomes its own Scout spec.
• Move shared setup into each spec (or a shared fixture/helper).
• Don't rely on spec execution order (it's not guaranteed).
• Split flows with different state requirements (localStorage, tour visibility) into dedicated specs.

6) Add helpers and constants

• Put shared helpers in test/scout*/ui/fixtures/helpers.ts (or API helpers in API fixtures).
• Add test-subject constants in fixtures/constants.ts for reuse across tests and page objects.
• For parallel_tests/ ingestion, use parallel_tests/global.setup.ts + globalSetupHook (no esArchiver in spec files).

Synthtrace in Scout API tests

Import the fixture from @kbn/scout-synthtrace (not from @kbn/scout / @kbn/scout-oblt alone). Merge it into your module's apiTest in test/scout*/api/fixtures/index.ts:

import { apiTest as baseApiTest, mergeTests } from '@kbn/scout-oblt'; // or '@kbn/scout' for platform-only modules
import { synthtraceFixture } from '@kbn/scout-synthtrace';

export const apiTest = mergeTests(baseApiTest, synthtraceFixture);

Specs then receive worker fixtures such as logsSynthtraceEsClient (index / clean) for @kbn/synthtrace-client generators (log, timerange, etc.).

Add the same Scout kbn_references on whichever tsconfig.json includes the Scout API files: either the plugin root tsconfig.json or test/scout*/api/tsconfig.json. Typical API set: @kbn/scout-oblt (or @kbn/scout), @kbn/scout-synthtrace, @kbn/synthtrace-client (add @kbn/synthtrace only if types require it). UI-only synthtrace: same @kbn/scout-synthtrace import in fixtures.

Where Scout tests are typechecked (choose one)

See TypeScript layout in the scout-create-scaffold skill for full Pattern A / Pattern B details (what to add to tsconfig.json, kbn_references, and the yarn kbn bootstrap / type_check steps).

Choosing: Prefer Pattern A when migrating FTR tests that already imported registration constants or server helpers. Prefer Pattern B when you want minimal plugin compile cost and can keep imports boundary-safe.

Scout API imports and TypeScript project boundaries (Pattern B only)

If the module uses Pattern B, treat the Scout API directory as isolated:

• Avoid relative imports into plugin server/ / public/ just to reuse a string constant—use api/fixtures/constants.ts or move the constant to common/ if both prod and tests should share it.
• Prefer @kbn/scout* / @kbn/synthtrace-client per that folder's kbn_references.

FTR migration tip: FTR often imported server files because tests sat in the plugin program. Pattern A preserves that. Pattern B matches "thin" e2e deps—duplicate small literals or use fixtures when adding server/ to the Scout tsconfig graph is wrong.

7) Extract component/unit tests where possible

• While implementing, look for logic that can be pulled out of e2e into RTL/Jest (see step 1). Not every FTR it block needs a Scout equivalent.
• Place RTL tests next to the component under test (e.g., my_component.test.tsx alongside my_component.tsx).
• Good extraction candidates from FTR/Scout to RTL:
  • Assertions on component props, loading/error states, or conditional rendering.
  • Table structure, column configuration, and row data rendering.
  • Form validation, filter interactions, and input clearing.
  • Tooltip content, hover behavior, and popover rendering.
• Keep Scout tests for what requires a real browser and running server: navigation, cross-page flows, permission-gated UI, and serverless-vs-stateful differences.

8) Clean up FTR wiring

• Remove loadTestFile entries from any stateful and serverless FTR configs/index files.
• Delete old FTR test files once Scout coverage is verified.
• For staged migrations, mark remaining FTR suites as describe.skip to avoid duplicate coverage.

9) Verify and run tests locally

• Typecheck: For Pattern A, run node scripts/type_check --project <plugin-root>/tsconfig.json. For Pattern B, run node scripts/type_check --project <plugin>/test/scout/api/tsconfig.json (and UI project if present). Use full node scripts/type_check when shared types changed broadly. Huge TS6059 / TS6307 counts under a Scout-only project usually mean Pattern B + forbidden server/ relatives—switch to Pattern A or fix imports (step 6).
• Use node scripts/scout.js run-tests --arch stateful --domain classic --testFiles <path> and node scripts/scout.js run-tests --arch serverless --domain observability_complete --testFiles <path> (adjust serverless domain).
• If the tests are under test/scout_<configSet>/..., run-tests auto-detects the server config set from the Playwright config path.
• start-server has no Playwright config to inspect, so pass --serverConfigSet <configSet> when your tests require a custom config set.
• Each test must include assertions in the test body (not hidden inside page objects; page objects should return state).
• UI tests must have at least one supported tag (Scout validates UI tags at runtime). API tests should also be tagged.
• Avoid checking raw data in UI tests; prefer page object methods over direct selectors.
• Preserve or update tags for deployment targets when needed; for solution modules, prefer stateful + solution serverless tags over tags.deploymentAgnostic (see Tags when the FTR suite was "deployment agnostic" under step 2).
• Run Scout tests in both stateful and serverless if the plugin supports both.

10) Review against Scout best practices

• Read and follow the scout-best-practices-reviewer skill on all new/changed Scout spec files.
• Provide the removed FTR test files as context so the reviewer can verify migration parity.
• Address blocker and major findings before finalizing; discuss minor and nit items as appropriate.

Common patterns

• Use test.step(...) inside a single test(...) when an FTR suite used multiple it(...) blocks as one journey.
• Parallel UI: isolate per-space state via spaceTest + scoutSpace; avoid hardcoded saved object IDs and make names unique (often suffix with scoutSpace.id).
• Use globalSetupHook in parallel_tests/global.setup.ts to ingest shared data once.
• Use page.addInitScript(...) before navigation to set localStorage/cookies (skip tours/onboarding).
• When FTR used rison-encoded query params, replicate with @kbn/rison and add @kbn/rison to kbn_references on the tsconfig.json that includes the Scout UI files (plugin root under Pattern A, or test/scout/ui/tsconfig.json under Pattern B).
• Add stable data-test-subj attributes when selectors are unstable.
• Centralize deep links + page-ready waits in page objects.

Common mistakes

• Migrating data validation UI tests instead of converting to API tests.
• Forgetting to split loadTestFile suites into separate Scout specs.
• Forgetting UI tags (required; Scout validates UI tags at runtime). API tests should also be tagged so CI/discovery can select the right deployment target.
• Placing Scout tests outside test/scout*/{ui,api}/{tests,parallel_tests}.
• Ignoring existing parallel Scout config (mixing tests/ with parallel_tests/).
• Using the wrong Scout package (solution tests in security/observability/search must import from their solution Scout package, not @kbn/scout).
• Using tags.deploymentAgnostic for specs under a solution plugin/package when the FTR suite was only “deployment agnostic” in the sense of shared stateful+serverless observability (or security/search) configs—those jobs still differ from the broad deploymentAgnostic tag set; use explicit tags.stateful.* + tags.serverless.<solution> instead (see step 2).
• Importing expect from the wrong entrypoint (use /ui for UI, /api for API).
• Using esArchiver in parallel_tests/ spec files (ingest in parallel_tests/global.setup.ts instead).
• Using nested describe blocks or *.describe.configure() (split into separate specs, or flatten small files into test + test.step—see step 3).
• Migrating near-identical stateful and serverless FTR files as two separate Scout specs instead of combining them into one spec with appropriate tags (see step 3).
• Spreading one user journey across multiple Scout test(...) blocks (fresh browser context per test).
• Hiding assertions inside page objects (ESLint expect-expect requires assertions in the test body; page objects should return state, not assert).
• Packing too many test(...) blocks into a single spec file. Keep specs focused: 4–5 short scenarios or 2–3 long scenarios per file. Oversized specs create bottlenecks in parallel execution.
• Using requestAuth.getApiKey('admin') for internal routes whose handlers create nested API keys—often HTTP 500; use samlAuth.asInteractiveUser and merge cookieHeader (see step 4).
• Using getApiKeyForCustomRole for FTR parity on scoped saved-object / RBAC assertions that used cookie + custom role—prefer samlAuth.asInteractiveUser(customRoleDescriptor) + cookieHeader so outcomes match FTR (e.g. 404 vs 200).
• Pattern B + relative imports from test/scout*/api/ into server/ / public/ (e.g. server/saved_objects/...). Fix by Pattern A (test/scout/**/* in the plugin tsconfig + Scout kbn_references) or duplicate constants in api/fixtures/constants.ts (step 6).
• Pattern A but forgetting to add test/scout/**/* to include or omitting @kbn/scout-oblt / synthtrace kbn_references—Scout files won't typecheck in check_types.