Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts. Use when user asks 'where are we in development', 'what stage are we in', 'full project audit'.
This skill scans your project to determine its current development stage, completeness of artifacts, and gaps that need attention. It's especially useful when:
Analyze project structure and content:
Design Documentation (design/):
design/gdd/*.mddesign/narrative/design/levels/():
src/Production Artifacts (production/):
Prototypes (prototypes/):
Architecture Docs (docs/architecture/):
Tests (tests/):
Based on scanned artifacts, determine stage. Check production/stage.txt first —
if it exists, use its value (explicit override from /gate-check). Otherwise,
auto-detect using these heuristics (check from most-advanced backward):
| Stage | Indicators |
|---|---|
| Concept | No game concept doc, brainstorming phase |
| Systems Design | Game concept exists, systems index missing or incomplete |
| Technical Setup | Systems index exists, engine not configured |
| Pre-Production | Engine configured, src/ has <10 source files |
| Production | src/ has 10+ source files, active development |
| Polish | Explicit only (set by /gate-check Production → Polish gate) |
| Release | Explicit only (set by /gate-check Polish → Release gate) |
DO NOT just list missing files. Instead, ask clarifying questions:
src/gameplay/combat/) but no design/gdd/combat-system.md. Was this prototyped first, or should we reverse-document?"production/. Are you tracking work elsewhere (Jira, Trello, etc.)?"/map-systems?"Use template: .claude/docs/templates/project-stage-report.md
Report structure:
# Project Stage Analysis
**Date**: [date]
**Stage**: [Concept/Systems Design/Technical Setup/Pre-Production/Production/Polish/Release]
**Stage Confidence**: [PASS — clearly detected / CONCERNS — ambiguous signals / FAIL — critical gaps block progress]
## Completeness Overview
- Design: [X%] ([N] docs, [gaps])
- Code: [X%] ([N] files, [systems])
- Architecture: [X%] ([N] ADRs, [gaps])
- Production: [X%] ([status])
- Tests: [X%] ([coverage estimate])
## Gaps Identified
1. [Gap description + clarifying question]
2. [Gap description + clarifying question]
## Recommended Next Steps
[Priority-ordered list based on stage and role]
If user provided a role argument (e.g., /project-stage-detect programmer):
Programmer:
Designer:
Producer:
General (no role):
Collaborative protocol:
I've analyzed your project. Here's what I found:
[Show summary]
Gaps identified:
1. [Gap 1 + question]
2. [Gap 2 + question]
Recommended next steps:
- [Priority 1]
- [Priority 2]
- [Priority 3]
May I write the full stage analysis to production/project-stage-report.md?
Wait for user approval before creating the file.
# General project analysis
/project-stage-detect
# Programmer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect programmer
# Designer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect designer
After generating the report, suggest relevant next steps:
/map-systems to decompose into systems/reverse-document design src/[system]/architecture-decision or /reverse-document architecture/reverse-document concept prototypes/[name]/sprint-plan/milestone-reviewThis skill follows the collaborative design principle:
Never silently write files. Always show findings and ask before creating artifacts.