Use when performing incident timeline reconstruction — post-incident timeline building framework for reconstructing the sequence of events from logs, alerts, chat messages, deployment records, and monitoring data. Provides structured approaches to gathering evidence, correlating timestamps, identifying gaps, and producing an authoritative incident timeline for postmortem analysis.
Incident: {{ incident_title }} Window: {{ incident_start }} to {{ incident_end }}
A precise, evidence-backed timeline is the foundation of every good postmortem. This skill guides you through gathering data from multiple sources, correlating events, and producing a single authoritative timeline.
Record every event with its exact timestamp, source, and type:
| Time (UTC) | Source | Type | Event Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| HH:MM:SS | monitoring/deploy/human/log | trigger/detection/action/decision/resolution | what happened |
After building the initial timeline, look for:
For each event, ask:
| Shortcut | Counter | Why |
|---|---|---|
| "We can skip some steps for this case" | Adapt the workflow steps, don't skip them | Skipped steps are where incidents and oversights originate |
| "The user seems to already know what to do" | Complete all workflow phases with the user | The workflow catches blind spots that experience alone misses |
| "This is a minor case, full process is overkill" | Scale the process down, don't turn it off | Minor cases become major when unstructured; the process scales, not disappears |
| "I'll fill in the details later" | Complete each section before moving on | Deferred details are forgotten; real-time capture is more accurate |
| "The template output isn't necessary" | Always produce the structured output format | Structured output enables comparison, audit trails, and handoff to other teams |
The final timeline should include: