Use when comparing competing states or explaining why weaker parties prevail. Analyzes material resources, leadership quality, and intangible factors like popular support, governance quality, moral legitimacy, and application of benevolence (仁义).
A method for analyzing why outcomes differ from what raw power comparisons would predict, focusing on intangible factors.
Compare quantifiable resources:
Evaluate:
When outcomes contradict material predictions, investigate:
Key question: Why did the weaker party succeed?