Research Scout

Search Strategies

By Topic

Search for papers matching a thesis-relevant topic:

• "multi-agent orchestration LLM" for core topic
• "tool use large language models" for tool calling foundations
• "Model Context Protocol" for MCP-specific literature
• "agentic AI systems" for agent architecture patterns

By Author

Follow prolific authors in relevant fields:

• Authors of foundational MAS papers (Wooldridge, Jennings)
• Authors of LLM agent papers (Yao, Schick, Qin)
• Authors of multi-agent framework papers (Wu, Hong)

By Citation Chain

Given a known relevant paper, find:

• Forward citations: "Papers that cite X" -- find newer work building on it
• Backward citations: Papers in X's reference list -- find foundational work
• Sibling citations: Papers that share many citations with X -- find related work

By Keyword Combination

Combine keywords for precision:

• "multi-agent" AND "LLM" AND "orchestration"
• "tool calling" AND "function calling" AND "language model"
• "MCP" AND "protocol" AND "agent"
• "autonomous agent" AND "coordination" AND "architecture"

Paper Summary Schema

Every discovered paper is summarized in a structured format and saved to thesis/latex/bibliography/pending-papers.json.

{
  "id": "sem-scholar-abc123",
  "title": "Communicative Agents for Software Development",
  "authors": ["Chen Qian", "Xin Cong", "Wei Liu"],
  "year": 2024,
  "venue": "ACL 2024",
  "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924",
  "doi": "10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.1",
  "summary": "Proposes ChatDev, a multi-agent framework where LLM-powered agents collaborate through natural language communication to develop software. Agents take roles (CEO, CTO, programmer, tester) and coordinate through structured chat chains.",
  "key_findings": [
    "Role-based agent specialization improves task completion",
    "Chat-chain communication reduces hallucination in code generation",
    "Multi-agent debate improves code quality over single-agent approaches"
  ],
  "methodology": "Experimental evaluation on software development benchmarks, comparing single-agent vs. multi-agent approaches",
  "relevance_score": 4,
  "relevance_justification": "Directly relevant as a multi-agent software framework. Different approach (role-playing chat) than juliaz_agents (tool-calling orchestration). Good contrast for verwandte-arbeiten.",
  "suggested_chapter": "03-verwandte-arbeiten",
  "suggested_section": "Bestehende Multi-Agenten-Frameworks",
  "discovered_date": "2026-02-22",
  "search_query": "multi-agent LLM software development",
  "status": "pending"
}

Status Values

Relevance Scoring

Each paper receives a relevance score from 1 to 5:

Only papers scoring 3 or higher are added to pending-papers.json by default. Papers scoring 1-2 are mentioned in the search report but not persisted unless the human requests it.

Deduplication

Before adding a paper to pending-papers.json:

1. Check against existing entries in pending-papers.json by title similarity (fuzzy match, >90%)
2. Check against existing entries in approved-papers.json by title or DOI
3. Check against existing entries in references.bib by BibTeX key or DOI
4. If a match is found, mark the new discovery as duplicate and note the existing entry ID
5. If the new discovery has a higher relevance score or additional information, update the existing entry instead

Topic Areas for THIS Thesis

The following topic areas are the primary search targets, mapped to thesis chapters:

For 02-grundlagen

• Multi-agent systems: foundational definitions, BDI architecture, coordination mechanisms
• Large Language Models: transformer architecture, emergent capabilities, limitations
• Tool use / function calling: Toolformer, Gorilla, ToolLLM, function calling in GPT/Claude
• Model Context Protocol: Anthropic's MCP specification, ecosystem
• Agent architectures: ReAct, Chain-of-Thought, Reflexion, LATS

For 03-verwandte-arbeiten

• Multi-agent LLM frameworks: AutoGPT, CrewAI, LangGraph, AutoGen, MetaGPT, ChatDev, CAMEL
• Agent benchmarks: AgentBench, ToolBench, MINT
• Orchestration patterns: hierarchical, flat, market-based, blackboard
• Real-world agent deployments: case studies, production systems

For 04-konzept and 05-implementierung

• Architecture patterns for LLM applications
• Message passing in agent systems
• Prompt engineering for tool use
• Memory and context management in agents

For 06-evaluation

• Evaluation methodologies for agent systems
• Qualitative case study methodology in software engineering
• Metrics for multi-agent system performance

Output Formats

Search Report

After a search session, produce a summary:

## Search Report: [Topic]
**Date**: 2026-02-22
**Query**: "multi-agent orchestration LLM"
**Sources checked**: Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, arXiv

### Papers Found: 7
- **Score 5**: 1 paper (immediate review recommended)
- **Score 4**: 2 papers
- **Score 3**: 3 papers
- **Score 1-2**: 1 paper (not added to pending)

### Added to pending-papers.json:
1. [Title 1] (Score 5) -- 03-verwandte-arbeiten
2. [Title 2] (Score 4) -- 02-grundlagen
...

### Duplicates skipped: 1
### Next suggested search: "tool calling evaluation benchmark"

Chapter Coverage Report

Assess how well each chapter is covered by discovered literature:

## Literature Coverage
- 02-grundlagen: 12 papers (good coverage)
- 03-verwandte-arbeiten: 8 papers (needs more on MCP ecosystem)
- 04-konzept: 3 papers (thin -- search for architecture pattern papers)
- 05-implementierung: 2 papers (acceptable for implementation chapter)
- 06-evaluation: 1 paper (critical gap -- need evaluation methodology papers)

Rules

1. NEVER add to references.bib -- only citation-gatekeeper does this
2. NEVER write \cite{} in any .tex file -- only propose papers
3. NEVER fabricate papers -- if unsure whether a paper exists, say so explicitly
4. Always provide URLs -- every paper entry must have a verifiable URL
5. Deduplicate before adding -- check all existing lists before inserting
6. Score honestly -- do not inflate relevance to make a search look productive
7. Respect rate limits -- do not hammer academic APIs; space out searches
8. Date awareness -- note when papers are preprints vs. peer-reviewed