Step 8: Build a structured knowledge map from the loaded papers. Central claim, supporting pillars, contested zones, frontier questions, and a newcomer reading list.
Based only on the loaded papers, create a structured knowledge map of this literature. Present it as a clear plan (no prose paragraphs).
The main assertion around which most papers are built — what they support, challenge, or refine. If there is no single central claim, identify 2 competing central claims.
Stable sub-claims supported by strong evidence across multiple papers.
For each: [Claim] — supported by: [Paper 1], [Paper 2]
Areas of genuine disagreement.
For each: [Question] — [Position A] vs [Position B]
Questions that this literature raises but cannot yet answer. Formulate as concrete questions, not vague "more research needed".
<RULES> - Selection criteria for the reading list: **foundational importance** for understanding the field, not simply high citation count - All sections must reference specific loaded papers - Do not add external papers or general knowledge </RULES>For each paper: [Author, Year] — why a newcomer should start with this one.
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "There is no central claim" | There are always organizing principles. If papers disagree, identify the axis of disagreement. |
| "I should recommend the most cited paper" | Foundational ≠ most cited. Recommend what builds understanding. |
| "All zones are contested" | Distinguish levels. Some disagreements are settled, others are active. Pick the 2-3 most active. |