Find, access, and cite conference papers and proceedings effectively
A skill for finding, accessing, and citing conference papers and proceedings. In many fields -- especially computer science, engineering, and HCI -- conferences are the primary venue for publishing cutting-edge research. This guide covers major proceedings databases, search strategies, and citation practices.
| Database | Coverage | Access |
|---|---|---|
| ACM Digital Library | ACM conferences (CHI, SIGCOMM, KDD, etc.) | Institutional or ACM membership |
| IEEE Xplore | IEEE conferences (CVPR, ICRA, INFOCOM, etc.) | Institutional or IEEE membership |
| DBLP | CS bibliography, links to proceedings | Free metadata |
| Springer LNCS | Lecture Notes in Computer Science series | Institutional |
| AAAI Digital Library | AAAI, IJCAI proceedings | Free for AAAI papers |
| NeurIPS / ICML / ICLR |
| ML conference proceedings |
| OpenReview (free) |
| arXiv | Preprints including conference submissions | Free |
Strategy 1 - Search by conference name:
Google Scholar: source:"NeurIPS" "transformer" "attention"
DBLP: Browse conference page -> search within proceedings
Strategy 2 - Search by topic across all venues:
OpenAlex: Filter by type "proceedings-article"
Google Scholar: Use keywords, then check venue names in results
Strategy 3 - Track specific conferences:
Bookmark the conference proceedings page (e.g., openreview.net)
Subscribe to DBLP RSS feeds for specific conference series
Follow conference Twitter/social media accounts for announcements
def assess_conference_quality(conference_name: str) -> dict:
"""
Framework for evaluating conference quality and reputation.
Args:
conference_name: Name or acronym of the conference
"""
indicators = {
"acceptance_rate": {
"top_tier": "< 25%",
"mid_tier": "25-40%",
"lower_tier": "> 40%",
"note": "Check conference website for historical rates"
},
"ranking_sources": [
"CORE Conference Ranking (core.edu.au)",
"CSRankings.org (CS-specific, based on publication counts)",
"Google Scholar Metrics (h5-index for venues)",
"CCF Ranking (Chinese Computer Federation, A/B/C tiers)"
],
"quality_signals": [
"Program committee reputation and size",
"Keynote speaker caliber",
"Longevity and consistency of the conference series",
"Whether proceedings are indexed in Scopus/WoS",
"Industry participation and sponsorship"
]
}
return indicators
Tier A* (Top): ICML, NeurIPS, CVPR, ACL, SIGCOMM, OSDI, CHI, KDD
Tier A: AAAI, ECCV, EMNLP, ICSE, WWW, CIKM, ICDM
Tier B: COLING, WACV, ICSME, PAKDD, AISTATS
Tiers vary by subfield. Always check the ranking relevant to your specific area.
1. Author homepages: Many researchers post preprints/camera-ready PDFs
2. arXiv: Conference-accepted papers are often on arXiv
3. OpenReview: NeurIPS, ICLR, and others host papers with reviews
4. Institutional repository: Check the authors' university repository
5. Conference website: Some conferences offer free proceedings
6. OpenAlex: Aggregates metadata and OA links from multiple sources
Workshop papers are shorter (4-8 pages), less rigorously reviewed, and represent more preliminary work. They are still citable but carry less weight. When citing, always distinguish:
# Main conference paper:
Author et al. "Title." In Proceedings of NeurIPS 2024.
# Workshop paper:
Author et al. "Title." In Workshop on X at NeurIPS 2024.
@inproceedings{vaswani2017attention,
title = {Attention Is All You Need},
author = {Vaswani, Ashish and Shazeer, Noam and Parmar, Niki
and Uszkoreit, Jakob and Jones, Llion and Gomez,
Aidan N and Kaiser, Lukasz and Polosukhin, Illia},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
volume = {30},
year = {2017}
}
@article instead of @inproceedingsAlways use the official proceedings citation provided by the conference or digital library.