Structured legal research with parallel multi-angle analysis, primary authority prioritization, and mandatory anti-hallucination self-verification. Produces practice-ready research memos with confidence ratings.
Activate when the user needs legal research on a question of law, regulatory analysis, or case law synthesis.
Before beginning:
For each sub-issue, research in parallel across all relevant angles:
Prioritization: Primary authority (statutes, regulations, binding case law) > agency guidance > persuasive authority > secondary commentary.
Run multiple searches per sub-topic. Do not rely on a single query.
Before delivering ANY output, complete this verification checklist:
If ANY citation cannot be verified, either remove it or explicitly flag it as "[UNVERIFIED — attorney should confirm]".
Research Memo Structure:
BOTTOM LINE (3-5 sentences) State the answer to the research question. Be direct. If the answer is uncertain, say so and explain why.
ANALYSIS For each sub-issue:
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK TABLE (if applicable)
| Agency | Authority | Requirement | Risk Level |
|---|
PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
LIMITATIONS AND CAVEATS
Be direct about conclusions. Do not write "it could be argued that" when you mean "the stronger argument is." State your conclusion, then note the counterargument separately. Attorneys need your best assessment, not a balanced presentation of every possible view.