Analyzes the campaign brief through Thorstein Veblen's status economics to identify where conspicuous consumption, invidious comparison, signal decay, pecuniary emulation, and counter-signaling shape purchase motivation — and how price itself functions as a status signal.
This is ANALYSIS, not generation. Output is structured findings about status dynamics in the campaign. No headlines, hooks, copy, or CTA text.
Convergence requires 3+ independent analytical dimensions pointing at the same territory. Two signals = notable. Three or more = convergence zone. Name the zone only when the threshold is met.
The Single Finding is singular. The highest-leverage status insight must be ONE positioning move — one status signal to amplify, one emulation pattern to ride, one price-as-signal play. Not a list.
Every finding must be specific to THIS campaign. "Premium pricing signals quality" is not a finding. "Positioning the McGinley Method at $197 instead of $47 signals 'serious golfer equipment' — the same bracket as a premium putter fitting — which activates status motivation in golfers who define themselves by their gear choices" is a finding.
Every finding must cite its analytical dimension. Tag all claims: [Status Signals], [Signal Decay], [Emulation Patterns], [Counter-Signaling], [Price as Signal]. Traceable to the specific lens.
In golf, EVERYTHING is a status signal. The putter you carry, the bag you use, the course you play at, the method you follow. A product positioned as "what serious golfers use" taps status motivation that resists rational persuasion. Premium pricing can INCREASE demand when the purchase signals competence/status.
Status signals decay. What was once exclusive becomes mainstream, then becomes a commodity signal. Assess where each signal in the campaign sits on the freshness-to-commodity spectrum.
Counter-signaling is the highest-status move. The truly confident golfer understates rather than displays. When the audience has high status, the copy should under-signal rather than over-signal. Bragging is low-status behavior.
Price sensitivity inverts for status goods. When the product signals status, lowering the price can DECREASE demand. Assess whether the current price point serves or undermines the status positioning.
Veblen's status economics reveals the social signaling infrastructure beneath purchase decisions:
Read the Engine Router output. Extract: offer structure, price point, authority positioning, target audience demographics, competitive landscape, proof inventory.
Map every status signal present (or absent) in the campaign:
For each status signal identified:
{
"dimension": "status_signals | signal_decay | emulation_patterns | counter_signaling | price_as_signal",
"finding": "Specific finding in one sentence",
"evidence": "What in the campaign brief and market supports this",
"leverage": "high | medium | low",
"copy_application": "Structural recommendation for downstream skills",
"recommended_for_skills": ["05", "06", "11", "15"]
}
The ONE status insight that would most change the campaign's positioning:
{
"thinker": "veblen",
"layer": "B",
"layer_name": "positioning_identity",
"campaign": "[project-name]",
"generated_at": "[timestamp]",
"findings": {
"status_signals": {
"product_signals": [ ... ],
"method_signals": [ ... ],
"authority_signals": [ ... ],
"price_signals": "...",
"missing_signals": [ ... ],
"leverage": "high|medium|low",
"copy_application": "..."
},
"signal_decay": {
"fresh_signals": [ ... ],
"decaying_signals": [ ... ],
"commoditized_signals": [ ... ],
"leverage": "high|medium|low",
"copy_application": "..."
},
"emulation_patterns": {
"emulation_chain": "...",
"adoption_flow": "...",
"aspirational_gap": "...",
"leverage": "high|medium|low",
"copy_application": "..."
},
"counter_signaling": {
"audience_status_level": "...",
"current_signal_intensity": "...",
"counter_signal_opportunities": [ ... ],
"leverage": "high|medium|low",
"copy_application": "..."
},
"price_as_signal": {
"current_price_signal": "...",
"optimal_price_signal": "...",
"inversion_risk": "...",
"leverage": "high|medium|low",
"copy_application": "..."
}
},
"single_finding": {
"insight": "...",
"why_highest_leverage": "...",
"downstream_impact": ["skill_05", "skill_06", "skill_11"]
},
"cross_thinker_notes": {
"girard": "Mimetic desire is the engine — status is the display layer",
"cialdini": "Authority principle is a competence status signal — deploy where status motivation peaks",
"ariely": "Status buyers are MORE susceptible to anchoring — price framing amplifies status perception",
"bourdieu": "Cultural capital determines which status signals register with which audience segments"
}
}
Save to: ~outputs/[project]/11-behavioral-intelligence/layer-b/veblen-findings.json