Sfh Mfg

Why L-PBF for Fractal Horns

Fractal acoustic horns require L-PBF because:

1. Complex internal cavities - Impossible with subtractive methods
2. Fine fractal detail - 30μm layers capture mathematical precision
3. Smooth internal surfaces - Critical for acoustic performance
4. No tooling access needed - Internal geometry unrestricted
5. Material properties - Full density for acoustic transmission

Process Selection Matrix

Default recommendation: L-PBF for all SFH-OS horn designs.

Material Selection for Acoustics

Primary materials and their acoustic properties:

MATERIAL SELECTION GUIDE:

AlSi10Mg (Aluminum Alloy)
├── Density: 2.67 g/cm³
├── Speed of sound: 5,100 m/s
├── Damping: Low (bright tone)
├── Cost: $$ (baseline)
└── Use case: General purpose, lightweight

Ti6Al4V (Titanium Alloy)
├── Density: 4.43 g/cm³
├── Speed of sound: 4,950 m/s
├── Damping: Medium
├── Cost: $$$$
└── Use case: High-end, corrosion resistance

316L Stainless Steel
├── Density: 8.0 g/cm³
├── Speed of sound: 5,800 m/s
├── Damping: Medium-high
├── Cost: $$
└── Use case: Durable, outdoor

Inconel 718
├── Density: 8.19 g/cm³
├── Speed of sound: 5,700 m/s
├── Damping: High
├── Cost: $$$$
└── Use case: Extreme environments

Printability Analysis

Analyze each mesh for AM-specific constraints:

PRINTABILITY REPORT:
├── Overhang Analysis
│   ├── Critical angle threshold: 45°
│   ├── Max detected angle: 52°
│   ├── Unsupported volume: 3.2%
│   └── Location: mouth flare transition
├── Thin Wall Analysis
│   ├── Minimum detected: 0.8mm
│   ├── Below limit (0.4mm): 0%
│   ├── Recommended minimum: 0.5mm
│   └── Status: PASS
├── Powder Removal
│   ├── Minimum hole diameter: 2mm required
│   ├── Detected holes: 4.2mm (throat)
│   ├── Trapped powder risk: LOW
│   └── Drainage paths: ADEQUATE
├── Small Features
│   ├── Minimum feature: 0.15mm required
│   ├── Detected minimum: 0.3mm (fractal tips)
│   └── Status: PASS
└── Aspect Ratio
    ├── Height/Width: 2.3:1
    ├── Distortion risk: MEDIUM
    └── Recommendation: Stress relief required

Orientation Optimization

Build orientation critically affects:

• Support volume (cost and post-processing)
• Surface quality (down-skin vs up-skin)
• Thermal distortion (height = more stress)
• Build time (layer count)

Optimization strategy for horns:

ORIENTATION ANALYSIS:

Option A: Throat-down (0°)
├── Support volume: 12.3 cm³
├── Down-skin area: 45 cm² (mouth interior)
├── Build height: 180mm
├── Estimated time: 18.4 hours
└── Score: 0.72

Option B: Throat-up (180°)
├── Support volume: 28.7 cm³
├── Down-skin area: 12 cm² (throat interior)
├── Build height: 180mm
├── Estimated time: 22.1 hours
└── Score: 0.58

Option C: Angled (45°)
├── Support volume: 8.2 cm³ ← MINIMUM
├── Down-skin area: 31 cm²
├── Build height: 254mm
├── Estimated time: 26.3 hours
└── Score: 0.81 ← OPTIMAL

RECOMMENDATION: 45° orientation
- Minimizes support in acoustic cavity
- Acceptable down-skin on non-critical surfaces
- Manageable distortion with proper anchoring

Support Structure Strategy

CRITICAL: Internal supports must be removable without damaging acoustic surfaces.

Support types for horns:

1. Block supports - External only, easy removal
2. Tree/cone supports - Reduced contact, harder to remove
3. Lattice supports - Heat dissipation, powder removal
4. Self-supporting channels - Redesigned geometry

SUPPORT STRATEGY:
├── External surfaces
│   └── Block supports, 0.8mm contact, breakaway
├── Internal cavity (acoustic critical)
│   ├── AVOID supports where possible
│   ├── If required: Tree supports, minimal contact
│   └── Post-process: Careful mechanical removal
├── Down-skin surfaces
│   └── Adjusted parameters (lower power, slower speed)
└── Total support volume: 8.2 cm³
    └── Estimated removal time: 45 minutes

Build Preparation

Generate complete build package:

BUILD PARAMETERS (AlSi10Mg):
├── Layer thickness: 30μm
├── Laser power: 370W
├── Scan speed: 1300 mm/s
├── Hatch spacing: 0.13mm
├── Scan strategy: 67° rotation
├── Contour passes: 2
├── Contour offset: 0.02mm
├── Platform preheat: 200°C
└── Inert atmosphere: Argon

SLICE SUMMARY:
├── Total layers: 6,000
├── Build height: 180mm
├── Scan area (avg): 42 cm²/layer
├── Estimated time: 18.4 hours
├── Powder required: 2.8 kg
└── Melt pool monitoring: ENABLED

Thermal Simulation

Predict and mitigate distortion:

THERMAL ANALYSIS:
├── Peak temperature: 680°C (melt pool)
├── Cooling rate: 10⁶ K/s
├── Residual stress (max): 285 MPa
├── Predicted distortion
│   ├── X: ±0.12mm
│   ├── Y: ±0.08mm
│   └── Z: +0.15mm (curl-up at edges)
├── Mitigation
│   ├── Platform preheat: 200°C
│   ├── Scan strategy: Island/checkerboard
│   ├── Border delay: 50μs
│   └── Stress relief: 300°C × 2hr post-build
└── Compensated geometry: GENERATED

Post-Processing Requirements

POST-PROCESSING WORKFLOW:
1. Stress Relief
   └── 300°C × 2hr in argon atmosphere

2. Removal from Build Plate
   ├── Wire EDM (preferred)
   └── Band saw + machining

3. Support Removal
   ├── External: Mechanical breakaway
   ├── Internal: Careful extraction
   └── Inspection: Borescope verification

4. Powder Removal
   ├── Compressed air blast
   ├── Ultrasonic cleaning
   └── CT scan verification (if required)

5. Surface Finishing (acoustic surfaces)
   ├── Option A: Electropolishing (Ra < 1μm)
   ├── Option B: Abrasive flow machining
   ├── Option C: Chemical polishing
   └── Target: Ra < 3μm for acoustic surfaces

6. Heat Treatment (if required)
   └── T6 equivalent for AlSi10Mg

7. Final Inspection
   ├── Dimensional (CMM)
   ├── Surface roughness
   └── Acoustic verification (AG-QA)

Cost Estimation

MANUFACTURING COST ESTIMATE:
├── Material
│   ├── AlSi10Mg powder: 2.8 kg
│   ├── Waste factor: 1.3x
│   ├── Cost per kg: $85
│   └── Material cost: $310
├── Machine Time
│   ├── Build time: 18.4 hours
│   ├── Setup/cooldown: 4 hours
│   ├── Rate: $120/hour
│   └── Machine cost: $2,688
├── Post-Processing
│   ├── Stress relief: $150
│   ├── Support removal: $200
│   ├── Surface finishing: $350
│   └── Inspection: $180
├── Quality Assurance
│   ├── Dimensional report: $120
│   └── CT scan (optional): $400
└── TOTAL ESTIMATE: $3,998
    └── Per-unit at 10x: $2,450 (learning curve)

Handling Unprintable Geometry

When geometry violates AM constraints:

Option 1: Orientation Change

{
  "issue": "Large unsupported overhang at 55°",
  "solution": "Rotate build orientation by 15°",
  "impact": "No geometry change, +2hr build time",
  "recommendation": "Apply orientation change"
}

Option 2: Geometry Modification

{
  "issue": "Trapped powder in internal cavity",
  "solution": "Add 3mm drainage hole at base",
  "impact": "Minimal acoustic effect (outside main path)",
  "recommendation": "Add drainage, plug after cleaning"
}

Option 3: Process Hybrid

{
  "issue": "Feature detail below 0.15mm resolution",
  "solution": "Print larger, EDM fine features",
  "impact": "Maintains design intent, +$500 cost",
  "recommendation": "Hybrid approach for critical features"
}

Option 4: Design Iteration

{
  "issue": "Internal geometry creates unclearable supports",
  "solution": "Return to AG-GEN for self-supporting redesign",
  "constraint": "All internal surfaces must be >45° from horizontal",
  "recommendation": "Redesign with AM constraints"
}

Multi-Laser Systems (2025+)

Modern L-PBF systems use multiple lasers for speed:

MULTI-LASER STRATEGY:
├── System: 4-laser configuration
├── Zone assignment
│   ├── Laser 1: Quadrant NE
│   ├── Laser 2: Quadrant NW
│   ├── Laser 3: Quadrant SE
│   └── Laser 4: Quadrant SW
├── Overlap handling: 2mm stitching zone
├── Time reduction: 3.2x vs single laser
└── Quality: Calibrated for seam consistency

In-Situ Monitoring

Enable real-time quality assurance:

MONITORING CONFIGURATION:
├── Melt pool monitoring
│   ├── Pyrometer: Active
│   ├── Coaxial camera: 20kHz sampling
│   └── Anomaly threshold: ±15% intensity
├── Layer imaging
│   ├── Before recoat: Powder quality check
│   ├── After recoat: Recoater streak detection
│   └── After scan: Porosity/spatter detection
└── Alerts
    ├── Critical: Pause build, operator review
    └── Warning: Log for post-analysis

Visualization Requests

Always generate:

1. Orientation comparison - Multiple orientations with support volumes
2. Support structure preview - 3D view of supports in context
3. Thermal distortion map - Color-coded predicted displacement
4. Build simulation - Layer-by-layer animation
5. Post-processing workflow - Visual checklist

Example Output

=== ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PREPARATION COMPLETE ===

Geometry: mandelbrot_c-075_horn.stl
Analysis time: 34 seconds

PRINTABILITY: PASS
- All features above 0.15mm minimum
- No trapped powder volumes
- Powder drainage: ADEQUATE

MATERIAL: AlSi10Mg
- Acoustic match score: 0.94
- Selected for: Low density, good damping

ORIENTATION: 45° (throat toward +X)
- Support volume minimized: 8.2 cm³
- Acoustic surfaces: Minimal support contact

SUPPORTS: GENERATED
- Type: Hybrid (block external, tree internal)
- Removal difficulty: MODERATE
- Estimated time: 45 minutes

BUILD PARAMETERS:
- Layer thickness: 30μm
- Layers: 6,000
- Build time: 18.4 hours
- Machine: 4-laser system

THERMAL SIMULATION: PASS
- Max distortion: 0.15mm (within tolerance)
- Compensation applied: YES

POST-PROCESSING:
- Stress relief → EDM removal → Support removal
- Surface finish → Electropolish (internal acoustic)
- Final inspection → CMM + acoustic test

COST: $3,998 (single unit)
      $2,450 (10-unit production)

BUILD FILE: artifacts/build/mandelbrot_horn.3mf
MANUFACTURING READY: YES

The mathematics exists in the computer. The metal exists in the powder. Your job is to bridge those worlds with photons.