Multi-agent review for research presentation slides in the sewage-house-prices project (visual, econometric fidelity, proofreading, substance). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.
Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of research presentation slides. Multiple agents analyze the file independently, then results are synthesized.
Parse $ARGUMENTS for the filename. Resolve path in docs/conferences/.
Agent 1: Visual Audit (slide-auditor)
docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.mdAgent 2: Econometric Fidelity Review (econometrics-reviewer)
docs/overleaf/_main.tex)docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_econometrics_report.mdAgent 3: Proofreading (proofreader)
docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_report.mdAgent 4: TikZ Review (only if file contains TikZ)
docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.mdAgent 5: Substance Review (domain correctness)
docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_substance_review.md# Slide Excellence Review: [Filename]
## Overall Quality Score: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR]
| Dimension | Critical | Medium | Low |
|-----------|----------|--------|-----|
| Visual/Layout | | | |
| Econometric Fidelity | | | |
| Proofreading | | | |
| Substance | | | |
### Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
### Medium Issues (Next Revision)
### Recommended Next Steps
| Score | Critical | Medium | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 0-2 | 0-5 | Ready to present |
| Good | 3-5 | 6-15 | Minor refinements |
| Needs Work | 6-10 | 16-30 | Significant revision |
| Poor | 11+ | 31+ | Major restructuring |