Full multiagent debate for validating a research gap
debate_critic, debate_defender, debate_judgedebate_critic({ artifact: gap, artifactType: 'gap', focusArea: 'novelty', context })debate_defender({ artifact: gap, artifactType: 'gap', criticOutput: C1, context })debate_critic({ artifact: gap, artifactType: 'gap', focusArea: 'feasibility', context })debate_defender({ artifact: gap, artifactType: 'gap', criticOutput: C2, context })debate_critic({ artifact: gap, artifactType: 'gap', focusArea: 'evidence', context })debate_defender({ artifact: gap, artifactType: 'gap', criticOutput: C3, context })debate_critic({ artifact: gap, artifactType: 'gap', focusArea: 'significance', context })debate_defender({ artifact: gap, artifactType: 'gap', criticOutput: C4, context })debateHistorydebate_judge({ artifact: gap, artifactType: 'gap', criticOutput: allCritiques, defenderOutput: allDefenses, debateHistory })