Role Calibrator

完成每一步立即 TaskUpdate → completed。靜默完成 = 違規。

為什麼強制：最容易漏的是 step 4（update related sections）—— 只加「角色定位」section 卻忘了更新「信件結構」裡的「提出想請教的點」，會留下前後矛盾的 rule。TaskList 強迫 step 4 被看見。

Step 1: Identify the Calibration

From the user's input, extract:

1. Who — which recipient's rules need updating (check .claude/rules/correspondence-*.md)
2. What domain — the user's area of expertise (e.g., statistics, programming, psychometrics)
3. Current problem — what language feels wrong (e.g., "用請教問 ANOVA 的事很奇怪")
4. Desired positioning — how the user wants to come across in that domain

Step 2: Read Existing Rules

Glob: .claude/rules/correspondence-*.md
Read the matched file(s)

Look for:

• Blanket deference rules that don't account for domain expertise
• Vocabulary tables that always map to humble language
• Missing "role positioning" section

Step 3: Add or Update Role Section

Add a ## 角色定位 section (or update if it exists) that specifies:

1. Writer's expertise domains — where they lead, not follow
2. Recipient's expertise domains — where deference is appropriate
3. Language mapping by domain:

## 角色定位

[Writer] 在這個合作中的角色是 **[role]**。[Recipient] 是 [their role]。

### 語氣切換規則

| 話題領域 | 誰是專家 | 語氣 | 用詞 |
|---------|---------|------|------|
| [domain A] | 寫信人 | 提供建議 | 「我建議…」「比較合適的做法是…」 |
| [domain B] | 收件人 | 請教 | 「想跟學長請教…」 |
| [domain C] | 雙方 | 確認對齊 | 「想跟學長確認…」「對齊一下…」 |

4. Replacement vocabulary for the expert domain:

Step 4: Update Related Sections

Check if other sections need adjusting:

• 信件結構: if it says "提出想請教的點", update to account for domain-based switching
• 用詞偏好: add domain-specific overrides
• 注意事項: add reminder about maintaining professional positioning

Step 5: Confirm with User

Show a summary:

已更新 `.claude/rules/correspondence-[name].md`：

角色定位：
- 統計/方法論 → 你是專家，用「建議」「確認」
- 商業/產業 → 學長是專家，用「請教」

你可以打開 `.claude/rules/correspondence-[name].md` 確認或修改。

Important

• Don't remove deference entirely. The user still respects the recipient as 長輩. The adjustment is domain-specific: expert tone for their domain, humble tone for the recipient's domain.
• Deference ≠ expertise. You can be respectful AND authoritative. "我建議用迴歸結果為主，ANOVA 作為補充，不知道學長覺得如何" — this is both respectful and expert.
• One rule file per recipient. Don't create a separate file for role calibration. Add the ## 角色定位 section to the existing correspondence file.