$38
Write grant proposals and funding applications for anthropological research that are funder-compliant, methodologically rigorous, and rhetorically persuasive to multidisciplinary review panels. Proposals should read as evidentiary contracts — specifying what data will be produced, how it will be analyzed, and how claims will travel beyond a single site — while preserving the interpretive depth and epistemic commitments that distinguish anthropological research.
| Funder / Genre | Reference File |
|---|---|
| NSF Cultural Anthropology (BCS, CA-DDRIG) | Read references/nsf-cultural-anthro.md |
| Wenner-Gren (Dissertation Fieldwork, Post-PhD, Hunt) | Read references/wenner-gren.md |
| Fulbright (IIE, Fulbright-Hays DDRA) | Read |
| Dissertation prospectus (committee, not funder) | Use the general workflow below; no funder-specific reference needed |
| Applied / consulting proposal | Use the general workflow below; adapt formality register to client |
For funders not listed above (ERC, SSHRC, Wellcome, etc.), use the general workflow and cross-cutting principles below. The architectural patterns — evidentiary contract structure, methods as feasibility signal, ethics as design — transfer across funders even when specific formatting rules differ.
Determine which funding mechanism the user is targeting. This shapes everything