Critique

4. Legibility & Readability

• Is body text comfortable to read for more than a few seconds?
• Are line lengths controlled?
• Are headings sized and weighted appropriately?
• Do rails, sidebars, or metadata blocks become too narrow to function well?

5. Layout Resilience

• Does the composition survive tablet and narrow desktop widths?
• Are any sections brittle, compressed, or overflowing?
• Are cards or panels trying to carry too much information in too little width?
• Is whitespace intentional or just unresolved empty space?

6. Interaction & Affordance

• Are clickable things obviously clickable?
• Are full-card interactions implemented semantically?
• Do hover, focus, and active states help?
• Are important actions hidden behind weak affordances?

7. Emotional Fit

• Does the interface feel right for the brand and use case?
• Is the tone intentional?
• Does it feel premium, playful, rigorous, calm, urgent, or whatever it should be?

Output Structure

Write the critique in this order:

1. Verdict: one short paragraph on the overall quality and the biggest issue.
2. Priority issues: the top 3-5 problems, ordered by impact.
3. What works: 2-3 strengths worth keeping.
4. Recommended next move: which skill to use next.

For each priority issue include:

• What is wrong
• Why it matters
• Fix with a concrete direction
• Use: the best follow-up skill

Follow-Up Skill Routing

• normalize for design-system drift
• redesign-ui for broad upgrades to an existing product
• polish for detail cleanup
• quieter for over-aggressive interfaces
• bolder for timid interfaces
• editorial-minimal for calm editorial directions
• premium-soft for polished premium calm without a newspaper tone
• industrial-brutalist for raw structural directions

Be direct. A critique that avoids tension is not useful.