Framework for making feature prioritization decisions
Make and document feature prioritization decisions with a structured framework. Ensures key factors are considered, stakeholders are consulted, and rationale is preserved for future reference.
/feature-decision [feature-name] - Make a decision on a specific feature/feature-decision - Start decision process with guided questionsAsk the user to clarify:
Before asking decision questions, gather relevant intel:
/customer-intel output if recently runGuide the user through these questions:
Customer Impact
Business Impact
Strategic Fit
Engineering Effort
Design Effort
GTM/Support Effort
What are we NOT building if we build this?
What's the downside of saying no?
Identify who needs to weigh in:
Must consult: [Based on feature type]
Optional consult: [Nice to have input]
Prompt user: "Have you consulted [stakeholders]? Want me to help prep for those conversations?"
Based on the framework, present a recommendation:
HIGH IMPACT
|
Do Next | Do Now
------------|------------
Later | Quick Wins
|
LOW IMPACT
Recommendation: [Do Now / Do Next / Quick Wins / Later / No]
Rationale:
Ask user: "Does this recommendation make sense? Want to adjust the decision?"
Create a decision document in 04-Projects/:
# Feature Decision: [Feature Name]
**Date:** [Today]
**Decision:** [Go / No-Go / Defer]
**Owner:** [User's name from System/user-profile.yaml]
---
## Overview
**Feature:** [Feature description]
**Origin:** [Where it came from]
**Requested by:** [Customers/stakeholders]
---
## Decision Framework
### Impact Assessment
**Customer Impact:** [High/Medium/Low]
- Who benefits: [Segment/customers]
- Problem solved: [Pain point]
- Users affected: [Count/percentage]
**Business Impact:** [High/Medium/Low]
- Revenue effect: [Details]
- Competitive position: [Details]
- Deal impact: [Details]
**Strategic Fit:** [High/Medium/Low]
- Pillar: [Which pillar]
- Quarterly goal: [Which goal if applicable]
- Long-term value: [Assessment]
### Effort Assessment
**Engineering:** [Small/Medium/Large/XL]
- Size: [Time estimate]
- Complexity: [Low/Medium/High]
- Dependencies: [List]
- Risk: [Low/Medium/High]
**Design:** [Details]
**GTM/Support:** [Details]
---
## Decision Rationale
**Why [Go/No-Go/Defer]:**
1. [Primary reason]
2. [Secondary reason]
3. [Tertiary reason]
**Trade-offs accepted:**
- Deprioritizing: [What]
- Risk: [What]
---
## Supporting Evidence
**Customer quotes:**
- "[Quote 1]" - [Customer], [Date]
- "[Quote 2]" - [Customer], [Date]
**Competitive intel:**
- [Details if applicable]
**Related conversations:**
- [Link to meeting notes]
- [Link to person pages]
---
## Stakeholder Alignment
**Consulted:**
- [Name] (Engineering) - [Their input]
- [Name] (Design) - [Their input]
- [Name] (Sales) - [Their input]
**Concerns raised:**
- [Concern 1 and how addressed]
---
## Next Steps
[If Go:]
- [ ] Create project in 04-Projects/
- [ ] Add to roadmap
- [ ] Schedule kickoff
- [ ] Update stakeholders
[If No-Go:]
- [ ] Communicate decision to requesters
- [ ] Update person pages with rationale
- [ ] Add to "not now" backlog with trigger conditions
[If Defer:]
- [ ] Document trigger conditions for revisiting
- [ ] Set calendar reminder for [when]
- [ ] Communicate timeline to stakeholders
---
## Decision Log
This decision is logged for future reference. Run `/decision-log` to see all major product decisions.
Save to: 04-Projects/Decision_[Feature-Name]_[Date].md
Offer to help with next steps:
"Decision documented! Want me to:
- Create a project file if we're building this?
- Draft stakeholder communication?
- Add to roadmap review?
- Update relevant person pages with this decision?"
/customer-intel to gather feedback/roadmap to check capacity/project-health for tracking# Feature Decision: Real-time Dashboards
**Date:** 2026-01-28
**Decision:** Go - Q1 Priority
**Owner:** Dave (CPO)
---
## Overview
**Feature:** Real-time dashboards that auto-refresh every 5 minutes, eliminating manual report compilation
**Origin:** Customer request (repeated pattern from 4 customers)
**Requested by:** Acme Corp (Sarah), TechStart (Mike), GlobalCo (Lisa), DataFlow
---
## Decision Framework
### Impact Assessment
**Customer Impact:** High
- Who benefits: All customers with reporting workflows (60% of user base)
- Problem solved: Manual report compilation taking 2 days/month per customer
- Users affected: ~500 users across our customer base
**Business Impact:** High
- Revenue effect: Unblocks 2 pending deals (TechStart, NewCorp) - $180K ARR
- Competitive position: ProductX has this, we don't - closing gap
- Deal impact: Sales team reports dashboards are #3 objection in demos
**Strategic Fit:** High
- Pillar: Product Quality
- Quarterly goal: Q1-2 (Reduce customer effort)
- Long-term value: Platform capability, enables future dashboard types
### Effort Assessment
**Engineering:** Medium (3-4 weeks)
- Size: 3-4 weeks
- Complexity: Medium (real-time data pipeline + UI refresh)
- Dependencies: Data infrastructure team (capacity confirmed)
- Risk: Medium (performance at scale needs testing)
**Design:** Small (1 week) - using existing components
**GTM/Support:** Medium - training needed, support documentation
---
## Decision Rationale
**Why Go:**
1. **Strong customer signal** - 4 customers in 30 days, increasing trend, 2 called it blocker
2. **Business impact** - Unblocks $180K in pipeline, closes competitive gap
3. **Strategic alignment** - Directly advances Q1 goal (reduce customer effort)
4. **Feasible scope** - 3-4 weeks, no major blockers, team has capacity
**Trade-offs accepted:**
- Deprioritizing: Mobile app performance improvements slide from Feb to March
- Risk: Need to validate performance at scale during beta
---
## Supporting Evidence
**Customer quotes:**
- "Takes 2 days/month to compile reports manually. Need real-time dashboards." - Sarah (Acme), Jan 24
- "Reporting pain is my team's #1 complaint. They avoid the system because of it." - Lisa (GlobalCo), Jan 15
**Competitive intel:**
- "ProductX's dashboards are way ahead of yours. We're evaluating a switch." - Mike (TechStart), Jan 20
**Related conversations:**
- 00-Inbox/Meetings/2026-01-24_Acme_Quarterly_Review.md
- People/External/Sarah_Chen_Acme.md
---
## Stakeholder Alignment
**Consulted:**
- Mike (Engineering Lead) - Feasible, 3-4 weeks, needs data team sync
- Sarah (Design Lead) - Can use existing components, 1 week effort
- John (Sales VP) - Would unblock 2 deals, closes demo objection
**Concerns raised:**
- Performance at scale (Mike) - Addressed: Beta test with 3 high-volume customers before general launch
---
## Next Steps
- [x] Create project in 04-Projects/Real_Time_Dashboards.md
- [ ] Add to roadmap (Q1 priority)
- [ ] Schedule kickoff for Feb 1
- [ ] Update stakeholders (Acme, TechStart, GlobalCo, NewCorp)
- [ ] Communicate timeline to sales team
---
## Decision Log
This decision is logged for future reference. Run `/decision-log` to see all major product decisions.