Ethnography

Assumptions

IRON LAW: Ethnographic validity requires PROLONGED ENGAGEMENT — short
visits produce tourist-level understanding, not cultural insight. If
your "ethnography" is based on a few interviews over two weeks, it is
NOT ethnography.

Key assumptions:

1. Culture is a system of shared meanings that must be understood from within (emic perspective)
2. The researcher must balance insider immersion and outsider analysis (reflexivity)
3. Thick description captures not just behavior but its meaning in context
4. Knowledge is co-constructed between researcher and participants

Methodology

Step 1: Gain Access and Establish Rapport

Identify the field site and negotiate entry. Clarify your role on the observer-participant continuum. Build trust over time. For netnography: identify the online community, lurk to understand norms, then participate.

Step 2: Conduct Participant Observation

Observe and participate in daily activities. Record detailed fieldnotes with descriptive (what happened), reflective (your interpretations), and methodological (research decisions) layers. Spend enough time to move past "frontstage" performances to "backstage" realities.

Step 3: Produce Thick Description

Move beyond thin description (surface behavior) to thick description (behavior + context + meaning). Interpret actions within the local web of significance. Use emic categories (participants' own terms) before imposing etic frameworks.

Step 4: Analyze and Write the Ethnographic Account

Identify cultural themes, patterns, and contradictions. Triangulate fieldnotes with interviews, documents, and artifacts. Write a narrative that conveys the culture's logic while maintaining reflexive awareness of the researcher's positionality.

Output Format

## Ethnographic Analysis: [Community/Culture]

### Field Context
- Setting: [description of the field site]
- Duration: [length of engagement]
- Researcher role: [observer/participant-observer/full participant]
- Access strategy: [how entry was negotiated]

### Cultural Themes
| Theme | Emic Term | Observed Practices | Interpretation |
|-------|-----------|-------------------|----------------|
| [theme] | [local term] | [what people do] | [what it means] |

### Thick Description Excerpt
> [A narrative vignette showing behavior in context with interpretive layers]

### Social Structure and Power
- Key actors and roles: [who matters and why]
- Norms and sanctions: [what is enforced and how]
- Tensions and contradictions: [where the culture is contested]

### Researcher Reflexivity
- Positionality: [how the researcher's identity shaped access and interpretation]
- Impact on setting: [how the researcher's presence altered behavior]

### Implications
1. [Cultural insight from the ethnography]
2. [How findings connect to broader theoretical conversations]

Gotchas

• Ethnography is NOT just "hanging out" — systematic fieldnote-taking and analytical discipline are required
• Reflexivity is essential: your positionality (gender, race, class, outsider status) shapes what you see and what people show you
• Netnography requires ethical consideration — online communities may not consent to being studied
• Do NOT impose etic categories prematurely — let emic understanding develop first
• The exit from the field is as important as entry — relationships and obligations do not end when the study does
• Thick description is interpretation, not just detail — a 10-page description without meaning is still thin

References

• Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
• Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research (3rd ed.). Sage.